GM reportedly forsaking JV battery plant with LG

Photo of author


General Motors (GM) is reportedly abandoning a joint venture battery facility with Korean battery manufacturer LG Chem.

GM has been on a tear over the past year and a half, establishing battery locations via its subsidiary joint venture created with LG called Ultium. However, its fourth production facility will reportedly no longer be pursued, according to leaked information given to Reuters.

According to information released by Ultium LLC in Q4 of last year, the fourth battery location of the business would be located in Carlisle, Indiana, and come at an initial cost of $2.5 billion. However, in a comment to the press at the end of the week, GM specified that “We’ve been very clear that our plan includes investing in a fourth U.S. cell plant, but we’re not going to comment on speculation,” indicating the situation regarding the plant’s construction may be more complex than initially reported.

One significant hurdle for GM could be its current ties to LG via its battery manufacturing subsidiary Ultium. In the case that GM decides to work with another battery manufacturer, it remains unclear if Ultium could manage that plant or if it would require its own management that could, in turn, work with the supplier; be that SK ON, CATL, or any other manufacturer. However, suppose GM will continue working with LG and establish the fourth location. In that case, the American auto giant may need to continue to work through a potentially arduous negotiation process.

As for LG, the South Korean battery maker has yet to back away from the negotiation table and released a statement on Friday to the Wall Street Journal, saying discussions were still ongoing.

See also  Foreign exchange Reserves Dive By $7.5 Billion As RBI Makes use of Battle Chest To Assist Rupee

As legacy automakers continue to look to expand their battery manufacturing prowess in the coming years, it is clear that the partnership model may not always be advantageous. And while many have appreciated sharing the cost of creating these numerous production locations with battery makers, it’s clear that Tesla’s more direct vertical approach also has its merits. It remains unclear if more companies will trend toward that direction in the future.

What do you think of the article? Do you have any comments, questions, or concerns? Shoot me an email at [email protected]. You can also reach me on Twitter @WilliamWritin. If you have news tips, email us at [email protected]!

GM reportedly abandoning JV battery plant with LG