You’ve likely heard it repeated that this NBA season has no obvious frontrunner, but the parity runs quite a bit deeper. We could, in fact, argue that this season contains more parity than any other in NBA history. Here are some relevant numbers:
- The lead the with a net rating of plus-6.1. If that holds, this would be the first season this century in which no team managed to crack plus-7. A typical champion is pushing double figures.
- The defending Western Conference champion is below .500. The three preseason Western Conference favorites have a combined record of 72-72.
- Two games separate the No. 2 and No. 5 seeds in the Eastern Conference. One of those teams gets to host a play-in team in the first round. The other won’t even have home-court advantage.
- The No. 6 and No. 13 seeds in the Western Conference are separated by one loss.
There will be no complaints of a predictable NBA this season. There’s no obvious answer for who will win the championship, and as such, more teams than ever are going to convince themselves between now and Feb. 9 that they can be the team that wins the championship. As such, we should expect a relatively active trade deadline.
Please check the opt-in box to acknowledge that you would like to subscribe.
Thanks for signing up!
Keep an eye on your inbox.
There was an error processing your subscription.
But who is going where?, so now, let’s talk about the buyers. With so many teams in the hunt, we’ll limit things to the top six seeds in each conference as well as a few stragglers who have an increased urgency to win this season, and we’ll cover what they need, where they might get it, and what it might cost.
- What they need? A shooting forward. Boston signed in the offseason for this exact purpose, but a torn ACL knocked him out for the season. filled the role beautifully early in the season, but he’s barely shot above 30 percent from deep since the beginning of December. Boston’s offense got awfully cramped when or sat last postseason, so filling this role, either with a rejuvenated Hauser or someone else, is imperative.
- Assets to offer? Boston only owes a single first-round pick, the one it sent to Indiana for , so Boston can move its other selections pretty freely. Matching salary is the bigger concern, as Boston’s six highest-paid players all play critical roles in the rotation. Still, Boston can offer Gallinari’s $6.5 million along with a smaller deal to nab someone making roughly mid-level money.
- Best targets? would be perfect, but he’s sadly just out of Boston’s salary range. Keep an eye on . He’s set for restricted free agency this offseason, and with the tanking, he’ll be available if Charlotte doesn’t plan to re-sign him.
- What they need? A reliable backup center. will take this role in certain postseason matchups, but certain opponents (notably, Milwaukee) necessitate a more traditional option, and with seeding paramount in the competitive Eastern Conference, Philly needs to find a way to win the minutes sits. As it stands, their net rating drops by more than 10 points per 100 possessions whenever he goes to the bench. This is especially important given Doc Rivers’ history in the postseason. His misguided commitment to cost Philly a chance to steal a game in Miami last postseason, and his refusal to bench led to a 3-1 collapse for the in the bubble. If Daryl Morey gives him the chance, Rivers will use the wrong center.
- Assets to offer? Philly can’t trade a single first-round pick thanks to several older deals, and because of the hard cap, they are severely limited in terms of absorbing salary. Fortunately, with and Danuel House proving inessential this season, the Sixers can aggregate them in bring in a backup making roughly $9 million. As far as value goes, they are essentially limited to players on the roster ( ?) and second-round picks.
- Best targets? The first call Philly needs to make is to Chicago for , who has seemingly fallen out of favor. Drummond makes only $3.2 million and played very well for the Sixers last season, so the fit is obvious. is another obvious candidate. His salary matches up with Korkmaz and House perfectly and he can hold his own defensively in practically any matchup. The cost there would likely only be second-rounders, so he’s attainable. might be worth a look if no better options are available if only because he at least has gimmick uses in the right matchups (though he’s a disaster defensively against the wrong offenses).
- What they need? It’s hard to say. There have been major offensive issues, but return likely solves many of them. Another wing defender would be appreciated as well, as they never quite replaced Tucker when he left in free agency. Ultimately, they’d likely prioritize another ball-handler over a defender if they had a chance to land either, but ultimately the market will probably dictate their target. Any solid rotation player could help given Milwaukee’s unusual lineup flexibility.
- Assets to offer? If the Bucks are willing to put their unprotected 2029 first-round pick in the table they’ll be able to add someone of significance. If not? They’re working with second-rounders and operating on the fringes. The Bucks are over the tax and having limited matching salary, but ($8.5 million) has become somewhat redundant now that is back, and ($4 million) probably can’t play in the playoffs, so flipping those two for someone in the $15 million range is the best course.
- Best targets? The two names to watch here are , who they’ve been linked to all season, and , who they nearly landed in 2020. Bogdanovic would become the best bench ball-handler they’ve had during the era, but Atlanta has played well since returned and may not want to sell. The would seem to prefer win-now talent in a Crowder deal, but perhaps Milwaukee could create a three-team deal with someone that wants Allen’s shooting.
- What they need? A shooting big man would be very much appreciated. Nic Claxton is having the best season of his career, but spacing in the playoffs will become an issue with him and , and even if it doesn’t, there are going to be moments when it becomes untenable to have two sub-50 percent free-throw shooters on the floor. Their wings tend to lean a bit more heavily toward “3” than “D” as well, so if the right wing hits the market, they’ll go for it. Shot-creation isn’t a need when healthy, but it would probably behoove them to trade for another scorer if the right one is available just because of the injuries and deal with every year. The Nets can’t win the title without them, but the right trade could insulate them against a random sprained ankle in the second round.
- Assets to offer? Brooklyn actually has plenty to work with. The Nets can trade their own 2029 first-rounder as well as the 2027 pick they got from Philadelphia in last year’s trade. Cam Thomas probably has value to certain teams and might as well. is their most obvious matching salary ($6.5 million), but in the right deal, they’d likely consider moving either ($8.5 million) or ($18.6 million) knowing that having one protects against the loss of the other.
- Best targets? They’ll make the call to Indiana for , but for now, he’s probably not moving. is worth a call if Chicago decides it doesn’t plan to re-sign him this offseason, but matching his $22 million salary would cost the Nets Harris, whom the may not be eager to absorb. The lower-end big man to watch here is , an offense-first backup in Minnesota who’s due for free agency this offseason.
- What they need? Someone between 6-foot-6 and 6-foot-9 who can either defend forwards credibly or consistently make open 3-pointers. That’s basically it. Their backcourt is set between , and . Their front court is set with , and . Even is a perfectly acceptable backup in that 3-and-D wing slot. They just need someone who can give them 25 competent minutes in the starting lineup.
- Assets to offer? Cleveland can’t offer a single first-round pick because of the Mitchell deal, but in , they have a veteran who would appeal to certain teams and in , they have a youngster who will appeal to other ones. Between the two, they have a decent chunk of the market covered. Throw in $7.5 million salary and they’re pretty flexible in terms of salaries they can absorb.
- Best targets? Crowder is the obvious call here, and given Phoenix’s health issues in the backcourt, LeVert might appeal to the Suns. Detroit would probably turn down any sort of Okoro-for-Bojan Bogdanovic offer, but that’s worth exploring. So is P.J. Washington, as the cost-conscious Hornets might like the idea of kicking the rookie extension can down the road another year. McDermott is definitely attainable if they want to prioritize offense.
- What they need? A star. This is true of most teams, but it’s especially true of Miami, a team too good to go backward but simply not talented enough to win three series against the five teams above them. Add another star to the mix and that might change. It’s that simple.
- Assets to offer? Anything but Mitchell and Kevin Durant in the offseason. The easiest star package to construct here would be (though his extension creates complicated base-year compensation issues), either or as matching salary and three first-round picks (which they could only unlock if they get Oklahoma City to agree to make their 2025 pick unprotected). and would theoretically be on the table as it was for Donovan
- Best targets? The have already made their first move toward the bottom by gift-wrapping to the . The Heat are surely watching with great interest. The same can probably be said of as Portland continues to slide. Either of Toronto’s forwards ( or ) could go a long way considering how thin Miami’s front court is, but for now, the appear likelier to move .
- What they need? Defense. can make virtually anyone work offensively. The Nuggets currently have the most efficient offense in NBA history. They need people who can prevent the other team from scoring. Any position will do. An upgrade at backup center would be helpful as well, as Denver’s net rating drops by a staggering 21.9 points per 100 possessions when Jokic sits.
- Assets to offer? Denver still has its 2029 first-round pick, but in order to trade it, they’d either need three teams (the Hornets, and ) to agree to remove protections on picks the Nuggets currently owe them or they’d need the accepting team to take the pick knowing it may never convey due to those protections. Without their first-rounder, they’d be limited to second-round picks and some of their promising younger players ( , and ). Matching salary is a challenge, but and get them to nearly $9 million.
- Best targets? The backup center question is complicated. Denver has, in the past, preferred having big men who could serve as offensive hubs like so that their bench wouldn’t need to deviate too harshly in terms of playing style. Those guys are hard to find, though Plumlee himself is likely available on an expiring $9 million contract. If they want someone who differs a bit from Jokic, Noel makes plenty of sense as well especially since his defensive versatility makes him theoretically viable in lineups featuring the reigning MVP. Old friend is certainly available in Orlando, and now that he’s found his shot again, he’d be a viable backup guard in the postseason.
- What they need? Basically nothing. The Grizzlies are an elite defensive (ranked No. 1) and rebounding (No. 2) team without sacrificing offense (No. 11). They’re not a great shooting team (22nd in 3-point percentage), so they could stand to add a sniper if they see one, but they aren’t going to risk compromising their defense for short-term gains. Basically, if the Grizzlies make a major trade, it will be because they’ve seen a long-term fit available at a fair price.
- Assets to offer? The Grizzlies have all of their own first-round picks as well as a few from other teams. They can credibly trade for any non-star on the market. $10 million salary represents their most obvious matching salary.
- Best targets? The Grizzlies are the obvious OG Anunoby team, especially if they don’t feel comfortable making an eight-figure commitment to this offseason. Gary Trent, or either Bogdanovic would be good fits to fill that shooting hole, but they all make a bit too much money to be traded just for Green. Given Trent’s age, he might be worth tossing in a youngster like to make the money work. If Green is the only salary they want to move, then Gary Harris and Doug McDermott are the two easiest fits.
- What they need? Perimeter defense. The Kings rank 23rd on that end of the floor, and while you could argue that a center might have a more pronounced impact on their defensive woes, moving to power forward (as he played in Indiana) would have a devastating ripple effect on their offense. The goal here is to find a forward who can help the defense without getting in the way of what’s working offensively.
- Assets to offer? The Kings only owe a single first-round pick to Atlanta from the trade, but the protections on that pick last until 2026. That bars them from trading any first-rounders until 2028. They could unlock an extra pick by removing those protections, but given their history, that’s a dangerous gambit. An easier workaround would simply be to trade a pick with “next available” language, but that requires a trade partner comfortable with uncertainty. , who has seen his role reduced with Huerter and in place, would surely interest teams. If they want to shop in the higher end of the market, would have a ton of value on the trade market.
- Best targets? The only player worth Murray that may be available is Anunoby. If that’s a swap the Kings could make, it’s worth serious consideration provided Anunoby is comfortable extending in Sacramento. He’s only 25, so like Murray, he could be a long-term fixture for the Kings. Assuming that trade isn’t on the table, a lightly protected future first-rounder for makes some sense. Is Washington still open to a deal? Or did they move Rui Hachimura expecting to back up the Brinks truck for Kuzma? On the lower end of the spectrum, Jae Crowder is a pretty clean fit at a lower price point.
- What they need? Not much. Like the Grizzlies, the Pelicans are playing well in almost every facet of the game. They’re a low-volume 3-point shooting team, so another shooter would be helpful, but they’re still so early in their contending cycle that they can afford to let this season play out, allow weaknesses to present themselves organically, and then adjust this offseason when they have a clearer idea of how this roster, when healthy, fares in the postseason. Right now, the Pelicans are so deep that it’s hard to say that they “need” anything. Many of the players other teams will add at the deadline aren’t even good enough to play meaningful minutes for the Pelicans.
- Assets to offer? Virtually limitless. They have their own picks. They have those very juicy Lakers picks. They have young players like . They have easy matching salary in and . The Pelicans can trade for any player that becomes available, stars included.
- Best targets? Many of the same shooters Memphis should target apply to New Orleans, but with more matching salary to work with, players like , Gary Trent and Eric Gordon feel more attainable. Gordon probably makes the most sense because he can be had at a minimal cost in terms of draft picks and with no long-term salary obligation (unless his team wins the championship, which guarantees his contract for next season, but something tells me New Orleans could live with that outcome). The Pelicans have the draft capital to go after Anunoby of VanVleet as well, but salary is the greater concern. Both would fit well, but New Orleans is already slated to pay the tax next season. Another hefty salary is probably not tenable.
- What they need? Another ball-handler. The Dallas offense gets roughly 12 points per 100 possessions worse whenever sits, and even when he’s on the floor, his usage rate of 38 percent is not sustainable. Doncic might be the best playoff player in the world through three quarters. He wears down late because Dallas hasn’t given him enough help. He’s reportedly asking them for help. There may not be a bigger single need across the league than this at the deadline.
- Assets to offer? Dallas currently owes the its 2023 first-rounder, but it is protected through 2025, so trading picks before 2027 is currently difficult. That Knicks pick is dictating a lot of Dallas’ hesitance right now. If the Mavericks can just hold out until the offseason, that pick will convey and they can offer their entire package of first-round picks, four of them along with three swaps, for a superstar to be Doncic’s long-term sidekick. If that is their plan, right now, they are limited to second-round picks. Fortunately, they have so much available matching salary that they can bring in almost anyone whose value is less than a first-round pick.
- Best targets? Charlotte, by virtue of its poor contracts, is probably a worthwhile starting point. If they could flip Tim Hardaway Jr. and second-round picks for Rozier just because Rozier has an extra year on his deal, that would be quite helpful. Perhaps there’s a bigger deal involving Gordon Hayward, but good players attached to bad contracts is where Dallas will find value without giving up a first-round pick. Bogdan Bogdanovic is another possible idea given his injury issues.
Los Angeles Clippers
- What they need? Someone who can pressure the rim. The Clippers have as much shooting as any team in basketball, but when either of their stars aren’t on the floor, they struggle to generate advantages and create good looks for those shooters. The Clippers rank 25th in restricted area shots per game and 27th in restricted area field goal percentage. Someone has to be able to get to the basket for this offense to work.
- Assets to offer? The Clippers can offer their unprotected 2028 or 2029 first-round pick, but the rest of their draft capital is tied to the Thunder as part of the trade. They have as much matching salary as is necessary, and aside from George and , virtually anyone should be on the table.
- Best targets? This is going to sound a tad crazy… but what about ? The Magic don’t need to trade him, but would probably prefer their guards to be shooters for the long haul given all of the ball-handling they have in the front court. Regardless of his shooting woes, he offers the exact traits the Clippers need. A more conventional approach might be someone like , who is early into a contract extension the rebuilding Hornets probably regret. He’s not as strong a finisher as Fultz, but he’s a better shooter and still explosive. He’s small, but the Clippers have more than enough wing size to cover for him.
- What they need? In the short term, they, like the Clippers, need to better pressure the rim. The Suns are extremely reliant on jump-shooting. The difference is that the Suns can afford to take a slightly longer view here than the Clippers because , and are so young. isn’t, so the priority will likely be finding a point guard who can eventually replace Paul in Phoenix’s core.
- Assets to offer? The Suns have all of their first-round picks, and between and Jae Crowder, they have plenty of matching salary as well. Practically anyone available is in play here.
- Best targets? Phoenix is the logical Fred VanVleet fit, though he provides almost no rim pressure. He’s one of the few guards on the market that could credibly fill in for Paul while playing with him in the short-term. He can defend well above his meager height, so three-guard lineups featuring Paul, Booker and VanVleet could survive defensively and destroy defenses on the other end through shooting, ball movement and basketball IQ.
- What they need? The Warriors never really replaced Otto Porter or , though has taken the latter’s minutes and provided value in different ways. A defensive guard and an all-purpose forward as insurance for (who is thriving, but is still too young and raw for significant playoff minutes) would be helpful. They’ve been linked to a few centers as well, but in the playoffs, there just aren’t enough minutes to facilitate someone like because will play the majority of his minutes there.
- Assets to offer? Is available? That’s the major question. Not only is he one of Golden State’s primary assets, but he’s their biggest matching salary at $9.6 million. The answer here is probably no. In such an open Western Conference, the defending champions probably feel as though they don’t need to risk their future for a win-now move. Therefore, virtually any major trade is unlikely.
- Best targets? If Wiseman is on the table, a swap for P.J. Washington makes sense for both sides. He could fill in for Porter, and if Draymond Green does leave in free agency this offseason, he gives Golden State a young forward to develop into some of those minutes. The Hornets just drafted , and he has flashed upside as a rookie, but Wiseman’s athleticism is too rare to pass up for someone they might not re-sign anyway.
Los Angeles Lakers
- What they need? Shooting and defense. The Rui Hachimura trade at least gives them competent NBA minutes at forward, which they’ve lacked all season, but no team makes fewer 3-pointers than the Lakers, and their defense has ranked 22nd since went down. They badly need 3-and-D players on either end of that spectrum, and if those players happen to be forward-sized? Then all the better.
- Assets to offer? Their 2027 and 2029 first-round picks. Put both of those on the table and they can add a real difference-maker or two. Get stingy and things get significantly harder, especially now that their second-round picks have been spent on Hachimura. is their easiest matching salary, but the truth is that they probably can’t trade their way into championship contention with $13 million. , at $47 million with a skill set that does not make sense in the postseason, remains their best bet financially.
- Best targets? OG Anunoby is the lone player on the market who is worth both picks unprotected. Myles Turner and Fred VanVleet and Gary Trent warrants both picks, and on another team that argument would be stronger, but the Lakers are already so guard-heavy that they’d be committing to entering the postseason with one of the league’s smaller rosters. For one pick, Bojan Bogdanovic and Kyle Kuzma are the forwards to watch. are as a tandem, but for now, that trade still seems dead. You could argue that the combination of